Ravi Shankar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53902 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2021 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD SON OF SHIVPUJAN SINGH PROPRIETOR ANKIT KHAD BHANDAR, RAYPUR CHOR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKAJHANWA PANCHAYAT NAD, P.S- BADDI P.O AND DIST- ROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the IPC and section 7(1)(a)(i) and FCO3(3) Essential Commodities Act. Allegedly, irregularities has been committed by the petitioner as he has sold 102 bags of Urea to one Urmila Devi and 90 bags of Urea to his mother and has not maintained price list stock register. Stock register and notice board has not been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53902 of 2021(3) dt.30-06-2022 2/2 properly maintained.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. It is further submitted that the license of the petitioner has been suspended by the Authorities. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent except this case, as also mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since license of the petitioner has been suspended, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sheosagar (Baddi O.P.) P.S. Case No.21/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.