← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53618/2021dismissed

Ram Prasad Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53618 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2019 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ram Prasad Rai Son of Bateshwar Rai Resident Of Village- Chmtha Number Tola, P.S- Bachhwara, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

This is the second attempt of the petitioner to approach before this Court for bail. Earlier, vide order dated 03.03.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23561 of 2020, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected.

Vide order dated 29.09.2021, a report was called for from the learned Court below regarding the stage of the trial and the time likely to be taken in conclusion of the trial. In compliance thereof, a report dated 23.10.2021 has been sent by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53618 of 2021(4) dt.01-12-2021 2/2 the learned A.D.J.-IX, Begusarai, which is at Flag 'A' to this application. In his report, the learned Judge has, inter alia, stated that the trial is likely to be concluded within next four months, if parties cooperate.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby once again rejected.

The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months. If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T