Md. Arsad @ Arshad @ Arsad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1485 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -140 Year- 2015 Thana -BAISI District- PURNIA ====================================================== Md. Arsad @ Arshad @ Arsad son of Md. Matin, resident of Basbari, P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnea .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Arif(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

16-02-2016 Heard Sri Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Arif, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, apprehending his arrest in Baisi P.S. Case no. 140 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 354-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in this case, some of the accused persons have been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by the court below itself. He submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case, whereas, Md. Arif, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor opposing the prayer for bail submits that in the F.I.R. itself, there is specific accusation against the petitioner of assault.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1485 of 2016 (3) dt.16-02-2016 2/2 In view of the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T