Bare Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 53923 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2021 Thana- DANAPUR RAIL P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Bare Yadav, Male age about 20 years, Son of Lal Babu Yadav, Resident of Village- Kateya, P.S- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with G.R.P. Danapur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2021 registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution story, the Sub-Inspector Shubham Kumar along with his associates were duty on the Railway platform, they saw a person in a suspicious condition near Coach No. S-6. He was nabbed and on search from his pocket, a mobile phone, Rs. 2,050/- cash and a piece of blade was recovered. As he could not reply to any of the query put forward to him, seizure list was prepared and he was arrested. It was in this way that the present FIR was lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that merely on suspicion, he was arrested and he is in jail since the date of occurrence, i.e., 26.03.2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53923 of 2021(2) dt.07-04-2022 2/2 Taking into account the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with G.R.P. Danapur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2021.

In view of the fact that he has criminal antecedent of the same nature while granting him the privilege of bail, some conditions are necessary which are as follows: (i) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates, the trial Court will cancel his bail bond; (ii) he shall visit local police station every month for next six months after his release from bail or till the conclusion of the trial, whichever is earlier;

(iii) if he commits the same offence again, the State shall take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. The bail application is allowed with the aforesaid observations.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Anand Kr.

U T