Awadh Kishor Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48161 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2023 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Awadh Kishor Paswan Son of Ram Chandra Paswan Resident of Simardah Kala, Ward No. 14, P.S. Suppi, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 315 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner along with other co-accused persons committed murder of the grandson of informant by inflicting knife blow.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. Allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he is in custody since 11.03.2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48161 of 2024(3) dt.06-09-2024 2/2
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific allegation that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted informant's grandson by inflicting knife blow, as a result of which, he sustained injury and while taking for treatment, the grandson of informant died on the way. As per the postmortem report, it is apparent that deceased sustained sharp-cut injury. Hence, petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on bail.
6. Having considered the accusation and other circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T