← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43551/2026bail granted

Bhagmani Devi @ Bhagmati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-03Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43551 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Bhagmani Devi @ Bhagmati Devi, W/o Late Sakal Manjhi, R/o Parauliya Mushari Tola, P.S.- Piprakothi, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nishant Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending her arrest in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No.424 of 2025 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is recovery of 14 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the seized illicit liquor was recovered behind the hut of the petitioner. Being an open place, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43551 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/3 accessible to the general public and, therefore, it cannot be said that the alleged recovery was made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that seizure list also appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses rather than by police personnel. It is also pointed out that the name of the petitioner surfaced solely on the disclosure made by the local villagers. The petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, who is a lady of clean antecedent, in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Excise Judge-I, East Champaran, Motihari in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43551 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 3/3 connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No.424 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Raushan/- U T