Satendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45244 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2023 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

SATENDRA KUMAR @ SATYENDRA KUMAR S/O KAMALDEV RAY R/O Village- Tetaria, P.S- Rajepur, Distt.- East Champaran. 2.

Nandlal Ray S/O Ramchlitar Ray R/O Village- Tetaria, P.S- Rajepur, Distt.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-08-2023 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Rajepur PS case no. 79 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The allegation is regarding altercation having taken place in between the parties, whereupon the petitioner no. 1 is alleged to have assaulted the brother of the informant namely Dharmendra Kumar with an iron rod, whereas petitioner no. 2 is stated to have assaulted one Karimchandra Ray by an axe. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45244 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/3 the petitioners are innocent, they have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are having a clean antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the injuries sustained by the injured person, attributable to the petitioners, have been found to be simple in nature, hence, the petitioners be granted the benefit of doubt for the purposes of grant of anticipatory bail.

5.

Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on record as also considering the fact that the petitioners are having a clean antecedent and the injuries sustained by the injured persons, attributable to the petitioners herein, have been found to be simple in nature, I deem it fit and appropriate to admit the petitioners to the privilege of anticipatory bail. 7.

Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45244 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 3/3 each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Rajepur PS case no. 79 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T