Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55001/2017bail granted

Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55001 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55001 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHNAR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Vikram Kumar Son of Deo Nath Rai Resident of village- Mahnar Tara, P.S.- Mahnar, Dist.- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Manhar P.S. Case No. 220 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 211 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from his possession rather recocery was made from a field. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 11.09.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55001 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Vaishali, Hajipur, in connection with Manhar P.S. Case No. 220 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T