Subhash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75215 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2018 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Subhash Kumar Son of Shivpujan Rai, Resident of Village- Harpur Juneda, Police Station- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar Goswami Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh For the State :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 29.04.2018 in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 311 of 2018 registered for the offense punishable under Sections 341/324/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a mentally disturbed person and taking into consideration such fact, this Court had directed him to be kept in a separate cell so that he may be given psychiatric treatment after obtaining a report from the jail doctor. It appears from the present application that the petitioner is in need of further treatment of his mental disorder at Ranchi Mental Hospital. Considering the aforementioned facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75215 of 2018(5) dt.15-02-2019 2/2 circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. West, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 311 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:

(1) Father of the petitioner will be the bailor.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T