Patna High CourtL.P.A/37/2016disposed

Dinesh Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.37 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11596 of 2010 =========================================================== Dinesh Prasad Yadav Son of Sri Bacchu Prasad Yadav, Resident of village - Katiyama, P.O. Kiyajori, P.S. Chakai, District - Jamui .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. District Magistrate, Jamui

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamui

6. The Block Development officer, Chakai, Jamui

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Chakai, Jamui

8. The Mukhiya, Dulampur Gram Panchayat, Dulampur, Chakai, Jamui

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Dulampur, Dulampur, Chaikai, Jamui

10. The Member, District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Jamui

11. Jitendra Kumar Yadav Son of Jai Narayan Yadav, Resident of village - Katiyama, P.O. Kiyajori, P.S. Chakai, District - Jamui .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 17-04-2017 In view of the fact that based on the remand order passed in the writ petition on 20th of May, 2015, the Appellate Authority has already conducted its proceedings and passed a final order and, being aggrieved by the final order, the petitioner has already filed a separate writ petition. Now this appeal is only of

Patna High Court LPA No.37 of 2016 dt.17-04-2017 2/2 academic interest and is rendered infructuous. As the petitioner has already challenged the order passed by the Appellate Authority on remand, liberty is available to the petitioner to prosecute all grounds as may be available in law for challenging the same.

The appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 21.04.2017 Transmission Date