Rabindra @ Gulten Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.54400 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2017 Thana -UDAKISHANGANJ District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Rabindra @ Gulten Paswan Son of Ghuran Paswan, R/o Village- Bobil, P.S.- Beldour, District- Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with UdaKishunganj P.S.Case No.125 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and it is alleged that some stolen documents have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case, nothing has been recovered from his possession rather from the house of other coaccused and as the petitioner did not agree to sign on the seizure list, as such he has been implicated in this case. Now the petitioner is in custody for three months.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54400 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 2/3 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Uda-Kishunganj, District Madhepura in connection with Uda-Kishunganj P.S.Case No.125 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54400 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 3/3