Tarun Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1789 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2017 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ====================================================== Tarun Kumar, Son of Ramakant Singh, resident of Village+ P.O.- Lanka Kachhuara, P.S. Gourichak, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sapna Devi wife of Tarun Kumar Daughter of Satyendra Narayan Singh, resident of Village+ P.O.- Masnadpur, P.S.- Sahjahanpur, District- Patna, at present resident of Village- ITI Shivnagar, P.O. Gonawan, P.S. Nagar, DistrictNawada. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. S.N.P. Sinha, Advocate Mrs. Anamika Sinha, Advocate Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 120B, 498A, 307/34 of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, but cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1789 of 2018(2) dt.16-01-2018 2/2 of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada Complaint case No.111 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T