Ram Janam Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1490 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Janam Singh S/o late Khenhari Singh resident of village- Karmwari, P.S.- Paroo, district- Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Panchayati Raj officer, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Block Development officer, Block Paroo, Muzaffarpur.

7. The Junior Engineer, Block Paroo, Muzaffarpur.

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Baijalpur, Paroo Muzaffarpur.

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Baijalpur, Paroo, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raj Kumar Rajesh, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. J.S. Barnwal, G.A.-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Rajesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Jai Shankar Barnwal, learned Government Advocate No.5, appearing for the State respondents. After some arguments, Mr. Raj Kumar Rajesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if

Patna High Court CWJC No.1490 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U