Shivji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14640 of 2019 ====================================================== Shivji Mahto S/o Vishwanath Mahto Resident of Village-Dakshin Mohanpur,Adi Gopalpur,Dist.Muzaffarpur,presently posted at Rajkiyakrit Upgraded Middle School,Kanhara Raghu Mushar,BlockBochahan,Dist.Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3.
The Director, Primary , Education Govt. of Bihar,Patna 4.
The Regional Dy. Director of Education, Tirhut Division,Muzaffarpur 5.
The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur,Dist.Muzaffarpur 6.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment),Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Purshottam Jha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Petitioner is aggrieved by non consideration of the case for grant of promotion as Headmaster and trained graduate pay scale whereas the juniors to the petitioner have been granted promotion.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that many teachers junior to the petitioner have been granted the benefit of Headmaster pay scale but the case of the petitioner was ignored by the respondents without going into the thicket of controversy
Patna High Court CWJC No.14640 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 whether the respondents have benefited the juniors ignoring the position of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to verify whether they have granted promotion as Headmaster to any person junior to the petitioner, in case any junior to the petitioner have been granted promotion and the petitioner is eligible for grant of promotion then they have to take appropriate decision regarding the claim of the petitioner.
Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondent District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur and grant all consequential benefits if admissible within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U