Kishundeo Sada v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43695 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2026 Thana- PRATAPGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
Kishundeo Sada Son of Pusay Sada Resident of village- Parasa Birbal Ward no. 11, Ps- Partapganj, Dist- Supaul 2.
Bahadur Sada Son of Pusay Sada Resident of village- Parasa Birbal Ward no. 11, Ps- Partapganj, Dist- Supaul 3.
Raja Kumar Son of Kushundeo Sada Resident of village- Parasa Birbal Ward no. 11, Ps- Partapganj, Dist- Supaul 4.
Mano Devi Wife of Kishundeo Sada Resident of village- Parasa Birbal Ward no. 11, Ps- Partapganj, Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Pramila Devi Wife of Dipu Sada Resident of village- Parasa Birbal Ward no. 8, Ps- Partapganj, Dist- Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, kidnapped
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43695 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 daughter of informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. During investigation, the victim was recovered and in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S. she denied the prosecution case and categorically stated that she was in love affair with Petitioner No. 3, namely Raja Kumar, and both of them had solemnized marriage. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S. and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-5th-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Supaul in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43695 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 with Partapganj P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T