← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40552/2020bail granted

Bablu Kumar @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40552 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2020 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== BABLU KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR, Son of Parshuram Bhagat, Resident of Village- Dumarsan, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 489/2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30, 30(a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

As per prosecution case, 190.08 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from the house of petitioner. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. He is not owner of the house in question. He has got clean antecedent. He is in custody since 11.09.2020.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40552 of 2020(2) dt.09-02-2021 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Addl. District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Saran, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) rakhi U T