Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15714/2015disposed

Shoabur Rahman @ Saidur Rahman v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-03-09Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15714 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2013 Thana -BAUNSI District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Shoabur Rahman @ Saidur Rahman Son of Manzoor resident of Village: Farkia, Tola, Tilkobari, Police Station, Bousi, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Husnara Khatoon daughter of Abdul Salam resident of Village: Farkia, Tola, Tilkobari, Police Station, Bousi, District- Araria. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

This criminal miscellaneous application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 23.01.2015 passed by learned Adhoc Additional District & Sessions Judge IVth Araria in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2013 , S.T. No. 850 of 2014.

A report has been called for from the court below, which has been received. From the report, it appears that charge has already been framed in this case and out of six prosecution witnesses, one witness has been examined. The court below has mentioned in the report that if the prosecution witnesses will be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15714 of 2015 (3) dt.09-03-2018 2/2 produced within the stipulated period, trial may be concluded within one year. Therefore, this Court does not deem it fit to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. Therefore this application is disposed of with direction to the court below to expedite the trial in accordance with law and make efforts to dispose of the same as early as possible preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) sushma/- U T