Md. Gulab Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42312 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2018 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Gulab Ansari Son of Md. Jainul Ansari, Resident of Village - Bachharpur Ward No - 3, P.S.- Pupari, Distt - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-09-2019 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 364 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased, however, the investigation has revealed that the wife of the petitioner had committed suicide.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implciated in this case. Although no one has appeared on behalf of the State, however, this Court has gone through the materials available in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42312 of 2019(3) dt.19-09-2019 2/2 the case diary which is on record. Death of the wife of this petitioner has taken place inside the matrimonial home where she was residing with this petitioner and in the case diary in paragraph 18 the views expressed by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer have been noticed by this Court.

In the given facts and circumstances, this Court is not willing to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail is refused. However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today before the learned court below the same shall be considered on its own merit on the basis of the materials available on the record without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T