Lavkush Kumar @ Lavkush @ Lokus Kumar @ Lokesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46417 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2024 Thana- SIGAUDI District- Patna ====================================================== Lavkush Kumar @ Lavkush @ Lokus Kumar @ Lokesh Kumar Son Of Manoj Paswan @ Manoj Prasad Resident Of Village - Chandhos, P.S. - Sigori, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vatsal Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 325, 307, 379, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a young boy aged about 20 years and is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the petitioner and the informant are co-parceners and are having dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant has not named the petitioner rather has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46417 of 2024(2) dt.02-07-2024 2/3 alleged that son of Manoj assaulted by lathi and rod on head causing injury. It is next submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that when informant is related to the petitioner then how come he was not aware of the name of the petitioner. It is next submitted that no doubt an altercation had taken place in the family on account of dispute relating to property and both sides assaulted each other and thereafter an FIR came to be instituted from the side of the petitioner also, but then it is submitted that petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence as such he was not named and in order to coerce Manoj into submission, the instant case was instituted implicating his son without naming him.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sigori P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46417 of 2024(2) dt.02-07-2024 3/3 No. 10 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T