M/S Rastogi Vastralaya P Ltd. Through Its Managing Director B.K.Rastogi @ Birendra Kumar Rastogi v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.229 of 2015 In LPA 1598 of 2012 ====================================================== M/s Rastogi Vastralaya (P) Ltd. Through Its Managing Director B.K.Rastogi @ Birendra Kumar Rastogi, Rastogi Market, Chowk Bazar, Biharsharif, Nalanda-803101 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Bhavisyanidhi Bhawan, R. Block Road No.6, Patna-800001

2. The Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Scope Minar, Core-II 4th Floor, Laxmi Nagar, District Centre, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi-110092.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : M/S Yugal Kishore,Sr.Adv.& Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prasant Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 20-01-2016 The review petitioner was unsuccessful writ petitioner. Mr. Yugal Kishore, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that unless the Provident Fund Commissioner supplies the petitioner the names of the alleged employees, in whose accounts the money is to be credited, the money cannot be so credited, because the petitioner denies having employees in excess of eight. These are matters which were urged and the Letters Patent Appeal was decided. There cannot be re-hearing of the matter. If the petitioner was so aggrieved by the order of this Court, then it had

Patna High Court C. REV. No.229 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2016 2/2 remedy of Appeal. The review is not substitute for Appeal.

2. This review application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) B.K.Roy/- U