Hari Bansh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.345 of 2016 dt.26-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.345 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- KISANGANJ ===========================================================
1. Hari Bansh Kumar S/o - Sri Ram Sevak Prasad Proprietor of M/S Kumar and Kumar, Registration No. PT61776, 52 - Gandhi Nagar, Boring Road, Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj.
3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Kishanganj.
4. The District Programme Officer, Kishanganj.
5. The Executive Magistrate, Nagar Parishad, Kishanganj.
6. The Executive Magistrate, Nagar Panchayat Bahadurganj (Kishanganj).
7. The Executive Magistrate, Nagar Panchayat Thakurganj (Kishanganj). 8.The Superintendent of Police, Kishunganj.
9. The officer-in-charge of Kishunganj Police Station.
10. Mr. Awadh Kishore Choudhary.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. M.N.H, Khan, SC 1 For the respondent no. 7 : Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-10-2016 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Avinash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. We have also heard Mr. Nityanand Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.
No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.345 of 2016 dt.26-10-2016 In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I. A. Ansari, CJ) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 29.10.2016 Transmission Date