Dev Kant Jha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.404 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2017 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur ======================================================
1. Dev Kant Jha S/o late Nagheshwer Jha
2. Meena Jha @ Meena Devi W/o Dev Kant Jha
3. Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Jha S/o Dev Kant Jha, R/o village Malikaur, P.S. Pusa, Distt. Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Pusa P.S. case no. 96 of 2017, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 201 and 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that the petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and 'Devar' of the deceased.
In the written report itself, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Pusa P.S. case no. 96 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.404 of 2018(4) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. VI, Samastipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T