← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53010/2021bail granted

Laxman Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-06Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53010 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2020 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== LAXMAN MANJHI S/o Late Chhaku Manjhi R/o village- Kharauna, P.S.- Atri- District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 66 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Recovery is of 15 liters of country made wine. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53010 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 2/3 of the petitioner but merely on the ground of suspicion, he has been made accused in this case. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 03.08.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II -cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 66 of 2020 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53010 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 3/3 verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) braj/- U T