Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62708 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2017 Thana -BHAGWANPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Jitendra Yadav, Son of Garju Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhorya, Police Station- Belaon, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Bhagwanpur(Belaon) P.S.Case No.l61 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 186, 427 and 504 of the I.P.C.

Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and there is allegation as per F.I.R. that police party raided the house of the petitioner in connection with this case and thereafter the petitioner and other co-accused persons assaulted the police party and pelted stone on their vehicle.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that according to the F.I.R. the petitioner was arrested and thereafter occurrence took place. He is in custody for 2 1⁄2 months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62708 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25.000/-(twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vth, Kaimur at Bhabua, in Bhagwanpur P.S.Case No.161 of 2017, subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (3) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U