← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43598/2019bail rejected

Bajrangi Chandravanshi @ Bajragi Chanrnsi @ Sanjeet Kumar@ Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-12Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43598 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

BAJRANGI CHANDRAVANSHI @ BAJRAGI CHANRNSI @ SANJEET KUMAR Son of Late Upendra Chandravanshi Resident of Village - Khaira Mohan, P.S.- Goh, Dist.- Aurangabad.

2.

Bablu Chandravanshi @ Prakash Kumar Son of Late Upendra Chandravanshi Resident of Village - Khaira Mohan, P.S.- Goh, Dist.- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. On query from the learned counsel for the petitioners with regard to the present stage of the case, the learned counsel submits that despite his best endeavour he could not seek instruction from the petitioners nor the petitioners ever contacted him in these four years. It is further submitted that the case was dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 12.09.2019 thereafter a restoration application was filed which was allowed by an order dated 17.02.2020. Learned counsel, thus, submits that since he has not been able to seek instruction in the matter from the petitioners nor the petitioners ever tried to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43598 of 2019(5) dt.12-02-2024 2/2 contact him as such for the present he is not in a position to give the present stage of the case.

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Court is not inclined to entertain the present anticipatory bail.

4. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 26 of 2019 pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daud Nagar, Aurangabad/successor Court.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T