Sunil @ Bahera @ Sunil Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44800 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1052 Year-2019 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SUNIL @ BAHERA @ SUNIL RAI Son of Tuna Rai Resident of Village - Bishunpur Said Ali, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.1052 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397, 412, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons are said to have committed dacoity in the office of Muthut Finance Company and looted away 55.777 k.g. of gold and cash Rs.50,000/-.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44800 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Only on suspicion, the petitioner is made accused in the present case. The FIR was lodged against 6-7 unknown persons.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T