Naveen Kumar Srivastava v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4937 of 2016 =========================================================== Naveen Kumar Srivastava Son of Sri Shiv Sharan Srivastava, Labour Enforcement Officer, Office of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Maurya Complex, Patna (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. The Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi.

3. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, Maurya Complex, Patna (Bihar).

4. Sri A.K. Sen, Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), cum Inquiry Officer, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, Maurya Complex, Patna (Bihar).

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr.M.P. Dixit, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kr. Choubey, Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate For the U.O.I. : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, C.G.C. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 15-03-2016 The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 18.02.2016, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna in Original Application No. 705/2015. By the said order, the Tribunal has rejected the claim of the applicantwrit petitioner to set aside the disciplinary proceedings on grounds of delay and the Tribunal has further ordered that the disciplinary

Patna High Court CWJC No.4937 of 2016 dt.15-03-2016 2/2 proceedings should be concluded within six months, failing which, subject to cooperation of petitioner, the proceedings would stand terminated.

After arguing the matter for sometime, Sri Tej Bahadur Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition to participate in the disciplinary proceedings and take such other remedy as may be available to him.

Smt.

Nivedita Nirwikar, learned Central Government Counsel has no objection.

Leave is granted.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Rajesh/Rajiv U