Arvind Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2225 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29815 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Arvind Kumar, Son of Late Prayag Narain Singh @ Prayag Narayan, Resident of Mohallah- Bhaisapur, P.S.- Biharsharif, District- Nalanda (Bihar). At present residing at Flat No. 102, Vinay Enclave, Janta Road, Jakkanpur, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Priyanka Kumari, Wife of Arvind and Daughter of Dayanand Das, Resident of Flat No. 105, Desoharan Palance, Vijay Nagar, Rukunpura, Bailey Road, P.S. Rupaspur, Patna- 800014.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. AMIT KUMAR RAKESH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 498A/34, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2225 of 2018(2) dt.18-01-2018 2/2 implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patna in connection with Complaint case No.29815C of 2014. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T