Indu Rai @ Indrajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53790 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2021 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

INDU RAI @ INDRAJEET KUMAR SON OF RAM PRAVESH RAI RESIDENT OF BELLA, P.S- VAISHALI, DIST- VAISHALI 2.

DHARVINDRA RAI @ DHARVINDRA KUMAR SON OF JALANDHAR RAI RESIDENT OF BELLA, P.S- VAISHALI, DIST- VAISHALI 3.

MANOJ RAI @ MANOJ KUMAR SON OF DHURUV LAL RAI RESIDENT OF BELLA, P.S- VAISHALI, DIST- VAISHALI 4.

SANOJ RAI @ SANOJ KUMAR SON OF DHURUV LAL RAI RESIDENT OF BELLA, P.S- VAISHALI, DIST- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 186 of 2021, Excise G.R. No. 610 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

In view of the fact that prima facie case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioners, this application

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53790 of 2021(2) dt.17-12-2021 2/2 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.). Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pravinkumar/- U T