Kuraish Priya And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10885 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Kuraish Priya Son Of Sri Mukund Murari Prasad Resident Of Ghagha Ghat Road, P.O. Mahendru , P.S. Sultanganj, District - Patna

2. Ram Narain Mistri Son Of Rambali Mistri Resident Of Village And P.O. Subnima, Via, Bakhteyarpur, P.S. Athmal Gola, District - Patna

3. Ashok Kumar Singh Son Of Late Prem Kumar Resident Of Prem Niwas, Ghasyari Ghat, Tripolia, P.O. Gulzarbagh, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar , Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department , Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Patna

5. The Additional District Magistrate, I/C Ivth Grade Appointment Committee, Patna

6. The Deputy Collector Establishment, Patna Collectorate, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Azeem, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sharoj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case a limited grievance has been raised that the Government has delayed in absorption of the petitioner on the regular establishment against the vacant post. The counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the Government policy decision it was decided to regularize the service of the employees who were working as daily wager in the office of the Collectorate and its subordinate offices. In pursuance thereof 1391 vacancies were identified, but the panel has been prepared consists of 410 persons divided into four

Patna High Court CWJC No.10885 of 2013 dt.12-05-2016 categories, namely, priority no. 1 having panel 160 persons, priority no. 2 having panel 62 persons, priority no. 3 having panel 39 persons and priority no. 4 having penal 193 persons. The claim of the petitioner submits that the name of petitioner is standing in the list at priority no. 3. Only the prayer has been made that process of absorption should be expedited and service of the petitioner should be regularised.

In such view of the matter, the case of petitioner will be considered for regularisation when his turn will come. It is expected that the Collector, Patna would expedite the process of regularisation if the sufficient vacancies are available in the Collectorate and its subordinate offices. It goes without saying that the Collector will ensure the reservation policy in its letter and spirit, will carry out the absorption taking care of roaster point.

The Collector will examine the memorandum dated 19.6.2013 which deals with in what manner the absorption can be made.

With the above observation/direction, this petition is disposed Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 13.5.2016 Transmission Date