Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44953 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2026 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Sandeep Kumar Son of Nand Kishor YAdav Resident of Village -Semaraw PS -Charpokhari District -Bhojpur 2.
Nagendra Kumar son of Nand Kishor Yadav Resident of Village -Semaraw PS -Charpokhari District -Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mayashankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 31 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 303(2), 353, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS 2023.
3. The allegation in the FIR is that this case appears to be a case of road rage, as the informant side has not given way to petitioner No.1, namely Sandeep Kumar on which they assaulted the informant, namely Rahul Kumar and daughter of informant who sustained injury.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44953 of 2026(2) dt.17-07-2026 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that the present case is a case and counter-case, and that the case instituted by the petitioners' side was lodged prior to the present FIR. Learned counsel further submits that the real dispute between the parties pertains to a land dispute, which is evident from paragraph No.12 of the petition. It is further submitted that, although the injuries sustained by Rahul Kumar and Subodh Kumar are grievous in the injury report, none of the injuries is on any vital part of their bodies. So far as the injury sustained by Priyanshu is concerned, the same has been found to be simple in nature.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
6. Considering the rival submission and fact that there is land dispute between the parties and FIR of petitioners is earlier then the FIR alleged by the informant and injury sustained is simple in nature or over non-vital part of the body. Accordingly, all above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, are directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court, Ara, Bhojpur where the case is pending in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 31 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44953 of 2026(2) dt.17-07-2026 3/3 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) rishabh/- U T