Arjun Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.76886 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2018 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ======================================================
1. Arjun Yadav S/o Rampukar Yadav,
2. Yadunandan Yadav @ Arun @ Arun Yadav, S/o Bigan Yadav
3. Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar, S/o Yamuna Yadav
4. Shionandan Yadav, Son of Bigan Yadav
5. Rampravesh Yadav @ Pravesh Yadav, Son of Late Ganauri Yadav
6. Rajmnandan @ Ramnandan, Son of Bigan Yadav, All Resident of VillagePiprahi, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajendra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dilip Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 353, 427,224, 225,307, 338, 379, 504, 333, 332, 393 IPC registered in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 196 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the FIR has been instituted as many as 26 named and 50 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature and no specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioners. Similarly situated co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by this court in Cr. Misc. No. 1040 of 2019. Petitioner nos. 2 to 6 claim clean antecedents and petitioner no. 1 is accused in a Complaint Case instituted at the hands of gotia.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76886 of 2018(3) dt.07-02-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Aurangabad, in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 196 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T