Ajay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40796 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2000 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== AJAY SINGH Son of Suresh Singh Resident of Village - Kanhauli, P.S.- Karai Parsurai, Distt - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Hilsa (Karay) P.S. Case No. 276 of 2000 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. The petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2019 This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. This is a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. The Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order that bail bond of petitioner was cancelled on 24.03.2001. This case was split up on 28.04.2001. The petitioner has voluntarily surrendered on 01.03.2019 and since then he is in custody.

There is no specific allegation against this petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40796 of 2019(2) dt.08-07-2019 2/2 in the written report.

The petitioner has sufficiently been punished for the laches on his part.

Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional District & Session Judge-II, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Hilsa (Karay) P.S. Case No. 276 of 2000, Session Trial No. 270 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T