Ram Khelawan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1732 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2020 Thana- SC/ST District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

RAM KHELAWAN SAH Son of Natay Sah Resident of Village - Chainpur, Ward No.3, P.S.- Bhimpur, Distt.- Supaul.

2.

RABINDRA SAH Son of Ram Gulam Sah Resident of Village - Chainpur, Ward No.3, P.S.- Bhimpur, Distt.- Supaul.

3.

RANJEET SAH Son of Ramesh Sah Resident of Village - Chainpur, Ward No.3, P.S.- Bhimpur, Distt.- Supaul.

4.

ARUN KUMAR SINGH Son of Mahendra Sah Resident of Village - Chainpur, Ward No.3, P.S.- Bhimpur, Distt.- Supaul. 5.

LALMOHAN SAH Son of Tetar Sah Resident of Village - Chainpur, Ward No.3, P.S.- Bhimpur, Distt.- Supaul.

6.

SHIV KUMAR SAH Son of Upendra Sah Resident of Village - Chainpur, Ward No.3, P.S.- Bhimpur, Distt.- Supaul.

... ... Appellants.

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellants :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Special P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2021 As prayed for, through Video Conferencing, let the learned counsel for the appellants remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter, within four weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course. Learned counsel for the appellants, through Video Conferencing, submits that the appellant no.1, namely, Ram Khelawan Sah, has already been arrested by the police. So far as the appellant no.2, namely, Rabindra Sah, appellant no.3,

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1732 of 2021(2) dt.31-08-2021 2/2 namely, Ranjeet Sah, appellant no.4, namely, Arun Kumar Singh, appellant no.5, namely, Lalmohan Sah, and the appellant no.6, namely, Shiv Kumar Sah, are concerned, they want to surrender before the court below as the process under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been initiated against them.

In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. Permission is accorded.

This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U