Chairman Cum Managing Director, Central Bank Of India And ORS. v. Ashok Kumar Sah And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

FIRST APPEAL No.28 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.

Chairman Cum Managing Director, Central Bank Of India, a body corporate constituted under The Banking Companies (Acquisition And Transfer Of Undertaking Act, 1970 Having Its Central Office At Chander Mukhi, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021 2.

Zonal Manager, Central Bank Of India, Zonal Office 2nd Floor, Block No. B, Mouryalok Complex, Dak Bangalow Road, Patna- 800001 3.

Regional Manager, Central Bank Of India, Sneh Bhawan, Bhatta Bazar, Purnea- 854 301 4.

Branch Manager, Central Bank Of India, Main Branch At Sah Katra, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Path, Katihar (New Market Road), P.O., P.S. And Dist.- Katihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Ashok Kumar Sah.

2.

Pradip Kumar Sha Both Sons Of Late Kapildeo Pd. Sah and Late Duleshwari Devi 3.

Smt. Nirmala Devi Wife Of Sri Chandradeo Pd. Sah 4.

Rajesh Kumar Sah Son Of Sri Chandradeo Prasad Sah And Nirmala Devi All Residents Of Mohalla Bara Bazar, Durgapur, Shiv Mandir Chouk, Katihar, P.O., P.S. And Dist. Kathihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Miss. Minu Kumari, Advocate Miss. Dilkash Khan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Anita Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 I.A. No.04 of 2019.

Heard counsel for the parties.

The aforesaid Interlocutory Application has been filed for withdrawal of the present appeal as the parties have settled the matter and have sanctioned the proposal of respondentslandlords for renewal of lease deed and payments of arrears vide

Patna High Court FA No.28 of 2014(17) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 letter BR/KAT/2019-20/02 dated 21.09.2019 which has been accepted by the plaintiff/respondents.

Annexure-A/1 dated 21.09.2019 as also para-2 of the petition read as follows:

"court cases to be withdrawn by both the parties" The learned Senior Counsel for the appellants submit that the aforesaid I.A. No.4 of 2019 be allowed for withdrawal of the present appeal.

In the facts and circumstance observed above, the I.A. No.04 of 2019 is allowed.

F.A. No.28 of 2014 In view of the fact that I.A. No.04 of 2019 stands allowed, the counsel for the appellants is allowed to withdraw the F.A. No.28 of 2014.

The same as such is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U