← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44041/2022allowed

Navin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-29Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44041 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2021 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Navin Kumar Son Of Chandrika Prasad R/O Village- Bherwa, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has got service for the post of Secretary in Watershed Management Programme by producing forged mark-sheet.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that in the year 2014, the petitioner applied for original certificate in Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya whereafter incorrect marks sheet has been supplied to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44041 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 petitioner by SKM College, Nawada. He further submits that on 03.11.2014, a new mark sheet along with original certificate has been issued by Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, in which petitioner has scored 499 marks out of 800. He submits that the petitioner himself left the job in the year 2014. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner himself left the job, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 58 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T