Santosh Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,Home Dept, Govt Of Bihar,Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1482 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1218 Year-2019 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Chaudhary S/O Nawal Kishor Chaudhary Resident of- Balaji Bhawan, Chanakyapuri, PS- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary,Home Dept, Govt of Bihar,Patna 2.
The Director General of Police,Govt of Bihar,Patna 3.
The Inspector General of Police,Tirhut Division,Muzaffarpur 4.
The Senior Superintendent of Police,Muzaffarpur 5.
The SHO,Ahiyapur Police Station,Distt-Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Karandeep Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.G.P.23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:
"(1) For directing the respondents for proper investigation in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1218 of 2019 dated 12.10.2019, registered for the offences punishable u/s 406, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
(II) Also, for directing the respondents to take all possible steps in course of investigation in order to arrest the accused persons and conclude the investigation in fair and proper manner in Ahiyapur P.S. Case No.
1218 of 2019.
(III) Also, for directing and commanding the respondents to protect the right
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1482 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 2/2 to life and property of the petitioner as granted under Article 21 of the Constitution of India."
3. Leaned counsel for the State submits that the investigation in this case has been concluded and final report has been submitted charge-sheeting some accused and exonerating some accused persons.
4. In these circumstances, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T