Vimal Chakrawarti @ Birendr Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76444 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2018 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Vimal Chakrawarti @ Birendra Pandit Son of late Mohan Pandit, Resident of Village- Sarrouni, P.S. Kawakol, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Gangandeo Yadav, Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocates For the Opposite Party :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the allegation that he was the Branch Manager of Weird Infrastructure Corporation Limited is incorrect. It is also denied that the petitioner is either Branch Manager or agent of the said Company. It is stated that the petitioner, his wife and father were also customers of the said Company. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP submits that the allegation that deposit was made by the informant through the petitioner has not been denied in the bail petition. It is also not stated that the petitioner and his family members being customers of the Company had suffered any financial loss. It is further pointed out from paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the case diary that accusation against the petitioner is supported.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76444 of 2018(3) dt.07-02-2019 2/2 of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

6. If the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail before the learned trial Court, the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law expeditiously and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.

BT/Chandran (Vikash Jain, J) U T