← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1423/2022disposed

Pradeep Kumar v. Pradip Kumar

2023-10-10Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1423 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19748 of 2021 ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar S/o Jagdish Sah @ Jagdish Prasad, R/o Ward - 11, Village and Post - Rajpur, P.S. - Rajpur, District - Rohtas, Bihar - 802219. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Pradip Kumar the Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna.

2.

Sanjay Prakash, the Deputy Manager, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna.

3.

Prakash Kumar, the Branch Manager, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Shahabad Branch, 1st Floor, G.C. House, Maharaja Hata, Ara, Bihar - 802301.

4.

Chandra Prakash Narayan, the Consultant Branch In-charge Bihar State Financial Corporation, Shahabad Branch, 1st Floor, G.C. House, Maharaja Hata, Ara, Bihar - 802301.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Puneet Siddharth, Advocate Mr.Aryan Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 10-10-2023 The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 02.12.2022, read with petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2022. Respondents have filed show-cause along with certain documents.

2. Perusal of the records, it is evident that petitioner has availed certain loan from the respondent-corporation. Petitioner has to settle arrears of principal and interest amount

Patna High Court MJC No.1423 of 2022(4) dt.10-10-2023 2/2 towards availing of loan to that effect they have calculated and communicated the decision on 18.09.2023 and 20.09.2023.

3. In the light of these facts and circumstances, the present MJC - contempt petition stands dropped, reserving liberty to the petitioner to agitate his right before appropriate forum, if he is aggrieved by the action of the respondents. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) abhishekkr/- U