← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3725/2014disposed

Ganesh Prasad Roy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3725 of 2014 ====================================================== Ganesh Prasad Roy Son Of Late Kailo Roy Resident Of Village- Tikaili, P.S.- Dandkhora, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Katihar 3.

The Executive Engineer Rural Development Organisation Katihar 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Katihar 5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Katihar 6.

The Circle Officer Dandkhora, District- Katihar 7.

Bisheshwar Mandal 8.

Barun Mandal 9.

Anant Mandal Respondent No. 7 To 8 Are Sons Of Late Bhagwan Mandal 10.

Saryug Rai Son Of Late Bhajju Rai 11.

Tapan Rai Son Of Saryug Rai Respondent No. 7 To 11 Are Resident Of Village- Tikaili, P.S.- Dandkhora, District- Katihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sc-6 M.K.Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Heard the parties.

In the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent to remove encroachment from the land of the petitioner bearing Khata No.205, Khesra No.651 area 2 decimals in Mauza Tikaili, over which without any valid acquisition and compensation the Respondent No.3 has constructed pakki road.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3725 of 2014(4) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the public road has been constructed on the land belonging to the petitioner without initiating any acquisition proceeding or making payment of compensation amount.

Considering the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed to file an application/representation before the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Katihar (Respondent No.2) within a period of 30 days from today. The Respondent No.2 shall consider the application/representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of filing of such application/representation.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U