Nikhil Singh @ Nilesh @ Nikhil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54051 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2021 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Nikhil Singh @ Nilesh @ Nikhil Kumar Son Of Nagendra Singh R/O Village- Vijay Rai Ke Tola, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran. 2.

Kunal Singh @ Kunal Kumar Son Of Vijay Shankar Singh @ Vijay Kumar Singh R/O Village- Goriyan Chapra, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran. 3.

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Gaurav Late Kameshwar Singh R/O Village- Vijay Rai Ke Tola, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No.158 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 504, 332, 333, 353, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners along with other co-accused persons named in the FIR and 100 unknown entered into the police station and assaulted the police personnel. The accused persons damaged the vehicles standing in the premises of the police station. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54051 of 2021(3) dt.07-07-2022 2/2 case. It is further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. As per the FIR, the petitioners are the members of the mob. The specific allegation is against coaccused, Pintu Singh. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application.

The learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No.158 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T