Patna High CourtMJC/2814/2013dismissed

Vidyanand Mahto And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-03Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2814 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21884 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Vidyanand Mahto, son of Late Hira Lal Mahto, resident of villageLailaria, P.S. Harsidhi, District-East Champaran.

2. Manoj Kumar, son of Late Lochan Mahto, resident of village-Bahurupia, P.S. Tirkaulia, District-Motihari(East Champaran). .... .... Petitioners.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Abhyanand, the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri J.K. Khanna, the Deputy Inspector General (Human Rights), Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Safi Alam, the Inspector General (Bihar Military Police), Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri R.S. Bhatti, the Chairman, Central Recruitment Board-cumAdditional Inspector General, S.C.R.B., Bihar, Patna.

5. Sri Nagendra Singh Yadav, the Chairman, BMP 20, Selection Board, Dumaraon.

6. .Sri Sunil Kumar, the Chairman, District Selection Board, Muzaffarpur.

7. Sri Vinit Vinayak, the Chairman, Central Region Board No.1, Patna.

8. Sri Lande Shivdeep Verman Rao, the Chairman, Central Region Board No.2, Patna.

9. Sri Nishant Kumar, the Chairman, District Selection Board, East Champran.

10. Sri Nishant Kumar Tiwary, the Chairman, District Selection Board, West Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. For the Opposite Parties : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ----------- 03-02-2015 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the main M.J.C. No.871 of 2012 has already been dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court. As such, this application has become infructuous.

Patna High Court MJC No.2814 of 2013 (4) dt.03-02-2015 2/2 In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U