Rajan Mahto @ Rajendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76449 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2013 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== Rajan Mahto @ Rajendra Mahto Son of late Bheldi Mahto Resident of Village P.O. Parora, P.S. K. Nagar, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nishant Kumar Sinha , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 569 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149,447, 427, 379, 353, 109, 337, 338, 332, 333, 323, 324, 326, 307, 329 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other 150-200 persons creating unlawful assembly and making hindrance to perform the official duty of police personnel.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no specific allegation has been attributed against him and only on the information of the Chaukidar, the name of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76449 of 2018(3) dt.30-01-2019 2/2 the petitioner transpired and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with K. Nagar P.S.Case No. 569 of 2013, to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purena, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. sudha/- (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) U T