Teni Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42890 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2013 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== TENI MAHTO S/O Bishwanath Mahto @ Vishwanath Mahto @ Vishwanath Singh Resident of Village- Kahari Tola, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 285 of 2013 registered for the offence punishable under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner had moved earlier four times before this Court for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 32059 of 2014, Cr. Misc. No. 6305 of 2015, Cr. Misc. No. 7568 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 9692 of 2019 which were rejected.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.09.2013.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42890 of 2019(3) dt.04-09-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 285 of 2013 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T