Patna High CourtCWJC/16290/2015withdrawn

Rajbali Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-22Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16290 of 2015 ====================================================== Rajbali Das S/o Late Faguni Das Resident of Village Laxmi Narainpur, P.O. and P.S. Goraul, District Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

3. The Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.

4. The District Panchayat Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

5. The Conducting Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali.

6. The Block Development Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc27- Kinkar Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 22-06-2017 The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 20.05.2014 passed by Respondent No. 3, Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur, as contained in Annexure-9, whereby the petitioner being Panchayat Secretary has been dismissed from service which has been affirmed by the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur vide the order dated 02.03.2015 passed in Service Appeal No. 19 of 2015, as contained in Annexure -11, hence, quashing of the same has also been prayed for.

A slip has been filed to the effect that both the orders have been challenged in Board of Revenue in Service

Patna High Court CWJC No.16290 of 2015 (2) dt.22-06-2017 2/2 Revision Case No. 43 of 2017 along with the petition for condonation of delay. Hence, the present writ application may be permitted to be withdrawn.

Permission is accorded.

The Member Board of Revenue will be at liberty to condone the delay in filing the revision in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy through the present writ application since 2015 before this Court.

Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U