Patna High CourtCWJC/971/2016disposed

Juli Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.971 of 2016 =========================================================== Juli Kumari, W/o Ranjeet Kumar, resident of Village- Khajahapur, P.O.- Khajahapur, Police Station- Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, I.C.D.S., Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. null null

3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

4. The District Programme Officer, Begusarai.

5. The District Development Officer, Begusarai.

6. The Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger.

7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Manjhaul, District- Begusarai.

8. The Block Development Officer, Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai.

9. The Child Development officer, Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai.

10. Sanju Kumari, w/o Jitendra Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Khajahanpur, P.O.- Khajahanpur, P.S.- Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 Mr. S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP-17 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of respondent no.10 to the post of Anganwari Sevika, Anganwari Centre No. 47, Gram Panchayat Khajahanpur, Block Cheriyabariyarpur, in the district of Begusarai.

Since any dispute relatable to the appointment of an Anganwari Sevika can be questioned before the District Programme Officer in terms of Clause 10.5 of the Anganwari Paryavekshika/

Patna High Court CWJC No.971 of 2016 dt.22-06-2017 Sevika/ Sahaika Guidelines, 2011 as amended from time to time, the petitioner could be well advised to exhaust the alternative remedy so available to her before she chooses to move this Court. The writ petition is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. (Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 23.06.2017 Transmission Date NA