Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.344 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -308 Year- 2017 Thana -BELAGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Yadav s/o Mahesh Yadav
2. Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Yadav s/o Mahesh Yadav All residents of village - Harigao, P.S. - Belaganj, Dist - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioners are in custody since 14.09.2017 in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 308/2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/323/325/307 /379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are alleged to have caught hold of the younger brother of the informant and one Mahesh Yadav is said to have fired on him. It is submitted that the injury report indicates the injury to be simple in nature and had there been any intention to doing away with the injured, there was no intervening circumstance to repeat the fire again. Hence, it appears to be a dispute between agnates which led to assault on the spur of the moment. There is also land
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.344 of 2018 (3) dt.17-02-2018 2/3 dispute between the parties and encouraged by village politics the present case has been lodged.
Considering the entire gamut of circumstances, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XI, Gaya, in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 308/2017
1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.
2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.344 of 2018 (3) dt.17-02-2018 3/3 case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T