Patna High CourtL.P.A/491/2016dismissed

Mrs. Gunjan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-05The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.491 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1294 of 2015 =========================================================== Mrs. Gunjan Kumari Daughter of Late Tulsi Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Nikauthia, Near Aveda High Schoo, Pakkisarai Road, Muzaffarpur, P.S. - Muzaffarpur Town, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Additional Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Director, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. Additional Inspector General, Weaker Section, C.I.D.-cum-Deputy Inspector General, Human Right Cell, Ex-Officio Member, Selction Committee, Bihar, Patna in a representative capacity of being Chairman of the Selection Committee. null null

6. Dr. Archana Anupam wife of Sri Ritesh Anupam resident of Anupam House, Sikandarpur Road, Muzaffarpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur Town, district Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Uday Prakash Shrarma For the Respondent/s : Mr. D.K. SINHA- AAG2 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 05-07-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length and on going through the reasons that weighed with the learned Writ Court for holding the appellant ineligible for selection as member of the Juvenile Justice Board. The learned Writ Court has found that appellant did not fulfill the qualification of being a Post Graduate in the subjects of Health, Education, Psychology, Child

Patna High Court LPA No.491 of 2016 dt.05-07-2017 2/2 Development or law and taking note of the illegality in the selection same has quashed and in doing so no error has been committed by the learned Writ Court warranting interference.

In view of the above, the appeal stands dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06/07/2017 Transmission Date NA