← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17309/2015disposed

Most. Umarawati Kunwar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-06Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17309 of 2015 ====================================================== Most. Umarawati Kunwar widow of late Uma Shankar Singh, resident of village Sorathi, P.S.- Dinara, District Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary to the Government, P.H.E.D., Bihar, Patna, Bisheshwaraiya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna 2.

The Chief Engineer, (Mechanical), P.H.E.D., Bihar, Patna, Bisheshwaraiya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna

3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Circle, Ara, District Ara

4. The Executive Engineer, P.H. Division, Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabua

5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Veerchand Patel Marg, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent State:

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 Mr. S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP-17 For the Respondent AG:

Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 The Executive Engineer, P.H. Division, Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabua, respondent No.4, is directed to revise the pay-scale of the husband of the petitioner in terms of the 6th Pay Revision recommendation and forward the same to the office of the Accountant General so that corresponding revision of pension, gratuity etc. can be made and authorized. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the husband of the petitioner was also entitled to the benefit of first and second A.C.P.. This aspect of the matter will also be verified and if found to be correct, appropriate corresponding revision even with regard to the same is required to be made and recommended

Patna High Court CWJC No.17309 of 2015 (3) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 to the office of the Accountant General.

This exercise must be done within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order. Failure on the part of the authorities to carry out the direction within the time frame will surely have consequences upon him, if a complaint is made about non-compliance of the order. Writ stands disposed of in terms of the above. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- U