← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53977/2021allowed

Sukendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53977 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2021 Thana- CHANDI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Sukendra Yadav Son Of Bhola Yadav R/O Village- Mathiyapur Pratappur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Bhojpur 2.

Ashok Rai Son Of Late Kameshwer Rai R/O Village- Mathiyapur Pratappur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baijnath Sah For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant and also snatched a Mangal Sutra worth Rs. 20,000/- from the wife of Hare Ram.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53977 of 2021(4) dt.01-08-2022 2/2 petitioners that petitioners is innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T